OneQAZ OneQAZ
← journal

2026-07-23 Crypto Trading Journal — Bengal

Key takeaways

  • 1330 closed trades, win rate 32.3%, expectancy -0.28% per trade.
  • Profit factor 0.58 · avg win +1.18% vs avg loss -0.98% (R:R 1.20).
  • Best +21.29% / worst -6.97% — every closed trade counted, losses included.

Metrics

MetricValue
Closed trades1330 (430W / 900L)
Win rate32.3%
Expectancy / trade-0.28%
Profit factor0.58
Avg win / avg loss+1.18% / -0.98%
Best / worst+21.29% / -6.97%

Recap

The day’s closed activity shows a mixed outcome. Out of 1330 trades, the win rate settled at 32.3%. The overall expectancy registered at -0.28% per trade, indicating that the average loss magnitude slightly outweighed the average gain. Wins were observed in assets like Access Protocol (ACS) at +9.27%, BLUR at +6.76%, and HOME at +5.41%. Conversely, notable drawdowns occurred in COS at -4.49%, ONT at -3.76%, and a secondary instance of ACS at -3.75%. The performance metrics, including a profit factor of 0.58, suggest that the magnitude of realized losses has been a significant drag on overall returns Bengal.

Observations on Drawdowns

The recorded losses, particularly the -3.75% and -3.76% movements on ACS and ONT, highlight instances where the market moved against the established directional bias. These outcomes suggest that the prevailing market conditions presented significant resistance to the initial thesis for those specific pairs. The spread between the best recorded gain (+21.29%) and the worst loss (-6.97%) indicates a wide dispersion in realized volatility across the sampled trades, which is a factor to keep in mind when assessing risk exposure Bengal.

For Next Time

The data points toward a need for greater caution when the expectancy drifts negative, as seen today. The fact that the average win (+1.18%) is substantially smaller than the average loss (-0.98%) suggests that the risk management aspect of the closed trades requires closer examination. The pattern of losses across different assets, including multiple instances involving ACS, suggests that sector-specific or asset-specific headwinds may be more impactful than anticipated in the current regime Bengal.

This research note reflects historical trade outcomes and does not constitute investment advice.

Notable trades (top 5 wins · top 5 losses)

ResultSymbolBuySellP&LHeldEntry → Exit (KST)
winAccess Protocol(ACS)0.18670.204+9.27%0.2h07-22 22:15 → 07-22 22:30
win블러(BLUR)23.2324.80+6.76%2.0h07-22 21:30 → 07-22 23:30
win디파이앱(HOME)9.269.76+5.41%2.0h07-22 21:30 → 07-22 23:30
win셀로(CELO)103.10106.90+3.69%29.8h07-21 23:45 → 07-23 05:30
winOpenGradient(OPG)152.20157.80+3.68%44.2h07-21 15:15 → 07-23 11:30
loss콘텐토스(COS)0.33860.3234-4.49%5.2h07-22 22:15 → 07-23 03:30
lossOntology(ONT)62.5460.19-3.76%9.8h07-22 14:45 → 07-23 00:30
lossAccess Protocol(ACS)0.20780.2-3.75%0.2h07-22 22:45 → 07-22 23:00
loss리프로토콜(RE)711.70685.30-3.71%1.8h07-22 23:00 → 07-23 00:45
lossKamino(KMNO)27.0526.05-3.70%47.8h07-21 11:30 → 07-23 11:15
_P&L distribution (300 meaningful trades): min -4.49% · P25 -1.20% · median -0.09% · P75 +0.74% · max +9.27%_

Full data — all 1330 closed trades: CSV download · or query live via OneQAZ MCP.

Related


As of 2026-07-23 (KST).

Disclaimer: OneQAZ figures are paper-trading research, not investment advice. Past simulated performance does not predict future real-money results.

Three ways to see OneQAZ — this post is the synthesis layer: