OneQAZ OneQAZ
← journal

2026-09-10 Crypto Trading Journal — Bengal

Key takeaways

  • 803 closed trades, win rate 31.0%, expectancy -1.20% per trade.
  • Profit factor 0.47 · avg win +3.48% vs avg loss -3.31% (R:R 1.05).
  • Best +185.07% / worst -19.24% — every closed trade counted, losses included.

Metrics

MetricValue
Closed trades803 (249W / 554L)
Win rate31.0%
Expectancy / trade-1.20%
Profit factor0.47
Avg win / avg loss+3.48% / -3.31%
Best / worst+185.07% / -19.24%

Recap

The session saw a high volume of closed trades, totaling 803 instances. The overall performance metrics indicate a negative expectancy of -1.20% per trade, with a profit factor below 1.0 at 0.47. While notable gains were recorded, such as House Party Protocol at +15.05% and 플록 at +12.69%, these were counterbalanced by several significant losses, including DoubleZero at -7.54% and 디파이앱 at -7.24%. The average winning trade (+3.48%) was not sufficient to offset the average losing trade (-3.31%). Bengal

Observations from Outcomes

The frequency of losses, particularly those exceeding 6% in magnitude, suggests that the prevailing market conditions presented significant resistance to sustained positive momentum across several assets. The disparity between the best recorded gain (+185.07%) and the worst loss (-19.24%) highlights substantial volatility capture, but the negative expectancy across the board suggests that the risk taken on the losing legs outweighed the realized gains. Bengal

Lessons from Drawdowns

The losses encountered, specifically those involving 2Z, HOME, and SOLV, point to an environment where momentum reversals were sharp and rapid. These instances suggest that when the market structure shifts quickly, the realized downside can be substantial, even when initial entry signals appeared valid. The cumulative effect of these drawdowns indicates that the risk management applied during the losing trades needs closer examination against the prevailing market regime. Bengal


This research note reflects a simulation of trading outcomes based on historical data and is not investment advice.

Notable trades (top 5 wins · top 5 losses)

ResultSymbolBuySellP&LHeldEntry → Exit (KST)
winHouse Party Protocol(HPP)9.1710.55+15.05%21.5h09-09 02:30 → 09-10 00:00
win플록(FLOCK)84.3595.05+12.69%11.2h09-09 11:30 → 09-09 22:45
win루미웨이브프로토콜(LWP)3.353.75+12.20%15.5h09-09 22:00 → 09-10 13:30
win엠블(MVL)1.281.40+9.22%22.0h09-09 03:00 → 09-10 01:00
win퍼퍼(PUFFER)20.3222.04+8.46%27.5h09-08 21:15 → 09-10 00:45
lossDoubleZero(2Z)69.0163.81-7.54%26.0h09-09 05:00 → 09-10 07:00
loss디파이앱(HOME)8.047.46-7.24%15.5h09-09 15:30 → 09-10 07:00
lossSolv Protocol(SOLV)5.815.46-6.06%4.5h09-09 20:30 → 09-10 01:00
lossSPACE ID(ID)45.7943.07-5.94%69.2h09-07 09:45 → 09-10 07:00
lossSolayer(LAYER)97.0291.38-5.81%30.2h09-09 00:45 → 09-10 07:00
_P&L distribution (300 meaningful trades): min -7.54% · P25 -3.65% · median -3.27% · P75 +0.21% · max +15.05%_

Full data — all 803 closed trades: CSV download · or query live via OneQAZ MCP.

Related


As of 2026-09-10 (KST).

Disclaimer: OneQAZ figures are paper-trading research, not investment advice. Past simulated performance does not predict future real-money results.

Three ways to see OneQAZ — this post is the synthesis layer: